2003
DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Currency Orders and Exchange Rate Dynamics: An Explanation for the Predictive Success of Technical Analysis

Abstract: This paper documents clustering in currency stop-loss and take-pro¢t orders, and uses that clustering to provide an explanation for two familiar predictions from technical analysis: (1) trends tend to reverse course at predictable support and resistance levels, and (2) trends tend to be unusually rapid after rates cross such levels. The data are the ¢rst available on individual currency stop-loss and take-pro¢t orders. Take-pro¢t orders cluster particularly strongly at round numbers, which could explain the ¢r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(140 reference statements)
5
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the aggregate face value of open orders is likely to be smaller, not larger, in the New York afternoon (Osler (2002)). Further, clustering patterns should be largely independent of time because orders are typically open for many hours.…”
Section: Time Of Daymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, the aggregate face value of open orders is likely to be smaller, not larger, in the New York afternoon (Osler (2002)). Further, clustering patterns should be largely independent of time because orders are typically open for many hours.…”
Section: Time Of Daymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, executed take-profit orders cluster more strongly at the exact round numbers than do stop-loss orders, and have no tendency to cluster above or below such numbers (Osler (2002)). The two tests both exploit the observation that if stop-loss orders are sometimes triggered in waves, the response to stop-loss orders should be larger, and should last longer, than the response to take-profit orders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We follow the Johansen procedure in order to test for cointegration of the exchange rate and the different types of order flow. First, the unrestricted VAR models Third, we estimate the related vector error-correction model suppliers by submitting conditional market orders, so-called take-profit orders, which trigger buy orders when the exchange rate falls to a pre-specified level and vice versa (Osler 2003(Osler , 2005, or they try to exploit intra-day exchange rate movements by applying a buy low/sell high strategy. The above interpretation of parameter signs suggests that, indeed, financial customers drive prices of foreign exchange, whereas commercial customers react to price changes.…”
Section: The Information Content Of End-user Order Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%