2006
DOI: 10.11130/jei.2006.21.3.593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Account Dynamics in OECD Countries and in the New EU Member States: An Intertemporal Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
84
4
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
18
84
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally the budget balance has a strong positive e ect on current account balance. This is consistent with a large number of papers (see for example Bussiere and Fratzscher(2006);Ca' Zorzi and Rubaszek (2008) ) which nd a positive association between current account balance and scal balance. As budget de cits redistribute income from future to current generations therefore resulting into capital in ows and current account de cits (Obstfeld and Rogo , 1994).…”
Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Finally the budget balance has a strong positive e ect on current account balance. This is consistent with a large number of papers (see for example Bussiere and Fratzscher(2006);Ca' Zorzi and Rubaszek (2008) ) which nd a positive association between current account balance and scal balance. As budget de cits redistribute income from future to current generations therefore resulting into capital in ows and current account de cits (Obstfeld and Rogo , 1994).…”
Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]supporting
confidence: 75%
“…Table 1 presents the estimation results for several variants of our model. As described above, the model is estimated over data organized into period-averages for four different periods: 1982-1986, 1987-1991, 1992-1996, and 1997-2003 The coefficient on the fiscal balance variable is quite low, at .11; however, our estimate is not all that far from many of the coefficients estimated by Chinn and Prasad (2003), Chinn and Ito (2005) or Bussiere, Fratzscher, andMuller (2004, 2005), which range from less than 0.1 to a little over 0.4.…”
Section: Quality Of Government Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Till now, CEECs and their CA positions were studied by Bussiére et al (2004) who estimate structural CA levels based on an intertemporal CA approach. Their main result suggests that the CA positions of the most of the acceding countries are compatible with the estimated structural CA levels, i.e.…”
Section: External Imbalances In a Monetary Union -Their Determinants mentioning
confidence: 99%