2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current advances and future outlook on pretreatment techniques to enhance biosolids disintegration and anaerobic digestion: A critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy expended cost is one of the factors which is necessary to determine the beneficialness of the pretreatment process, and it almost accounts for about 62% of the capital cost (Sharmila et al, 2020a). In the wastewater treatment plant, biosolids management accounts for 50% of the operating cost, and the economic feasibility of the pretreatment method is marginally associated with bioenergy generation and solids reduction (Uthirakrishnan et al, 2022). The addition of the pretreatment process to the traditional anaerobic digester adds on operational expenditures, whereas in microalgal biomass, the effective bioenergy generation hinges on the cost incurred for cultivation, harvesting, conversion to energy operation of the digester and product purification, product price, and overhead charges.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy expended cost is one of the factors which is necessary to determine the beneficialness of the pretreatment process, and it almost accounts for about 62% of the capital cost (Sharmila et al, 2020a). In the wastewater treatment plant, biosolids management accounts for 50% of the operating cost, and the economic feasibility of the pretreatment method is marginally associated with bioenergy generation and solids reduction (Uthirakrishnan et al, 2022). The addition of the pretreatment process to the traditional anaerobic digester adds on operational expenditures, whereas in microalgal biomass, the effective bioenergy generation hinges on the cost incurred for cultivation, harvesting, conversion to energy operation of the digester and product purification, product price, and overhead charges.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent trends have shown that rather than discarding the biosolids, the waste hierarchy is needed. According to Uthirakrishnan et al [ 9 ], the three R’s of waste consist of Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle which is a useful approach to make biosolids disposal safer by the anaerobic digestion process. Based on the procedures—reduction of biosolid volume, development of reusable byproducts—biogas (a renewable energy source), electricity, and reuse of leftover compost (used as fertilizer)—according to our opinion, the three R’s approach is suitable to apply to improving waste biomass disposal through biological developments that focus on the transformation of waste resources into value-added products.…”
Section: Recent Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ [100][101][102][103][104]72] Bio-polymers can be also applied for soli to promote its water retention properties, particular in semi-arid environments.…”
Section: Excess Granular Sludge and Circular Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the granules' characteristics, the applied shear force is also a critical factor that should be considered when designing the dewatering stage of AGS. Uthirakrishnan et al [72] highlighted that conventional dewatering centrifugation might negatively impact the dewaterability of AGS. Zhang et al [70] found that the AGS exhibited a low dewaterability as a result of granules disintegration when a high shear force has been applied.…”
Section: Dewaterability Of Excess Granular Sludgementioning
confidence: 99%