2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current advances and future perspectives of image fusion: A comprehensive review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 231 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table 4, compared to the spectral intensity images, the EIs of the polarization images are improved by 54.60% (@ 450 nm), 60.60% (@ 532 nm), and 60.18% (@ 632 nm), indicating the ability of polarization detection to highlight target detail [35]. Using imaging fusion [36] can enrich target or scene multidimensional information, as shown in Figure 15. Compared to the conventional intensity image, the STU pattern in the spectral image in Figure 15b can apparently be identified as a red S letter, green T letter, and blue U letter, showing the excellent ability of LCTFs to discriminate spectral components.…”
Section: Snr (Dbmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As shown in Table 4, compared to the spectral intensity images, the EIs of the polarization images are improved by 54.60% (@ 450 nm), 60.60% (@ 532 nm), and 60.18% (@ 632 nm), indicating the ability of polarization detection to highlight target detail [35]. Using imaging fusion [36] can enrich target or scene multidimensional information, as shown in Figure 15. Compared to the conventional intensity image, the STU pattern in the spectral image in Figure 15b can apparently be identified as a red S letter, green T letter, and blue U letter, showing the excellent ability of LCTFs to discriminate spectral components.…”
Section: Snr (Dbmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Numerous image fusion methodologies have been devised to effectively combine a panchromatic (PAN) image and a multi-spectral (MS) image, resulting in an MS image that exhibits enhanced spatial and spectral resolution simultaneously. While previous research has focused mostly on the basic insight of image fusion, including the classification on the basis of the number of sensors used, processing levels, and type of information being fused [3,4,[6][7][8], this review article covers every aspect, including the prevailing state of pansharpening and spatiotemporal fusion methods for remote sensing, their real-world applications, knowledge gaps, and potential future directions. Although numerous authors have examined either pansharpening or spatiotemporal fusion in the domain of remote sensing, they have not conducted an exhaustive examination of both [5,9,10].…”
Section: Contribution Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, many multi-focus image fusion methods have been proposed. Especially, the methods based on multi-scale transform, sparse representation, edge-preserving filtering, and deep learning have achieved remarkable results in image fusion [ 16 ]. The curvelet [ 17 ], surfacelet [ 18 ], contourlet [ 19 , 20 ], and shearlet transforms [ 21 , 22 , 23 ] are widely used in multi-scale transform fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%