2021
DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and Emerging Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance

Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Early detection of HCC enables patients to avail curative therapies that can improve patient survival. Current international guidelines advocate for the enrollment of patients at high risk for HCC, like those with cirrhosis, in surveillance programs that perform ultrasound every 6 months. In recent years, many studies have further characterized the utility of established screening strategies and have introduced new promisi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
(270 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the most frequently used cut-off value (10%), AFP-L3% has a specificity of 99.4% with a low sensitivity of 18.8%, indicating a poor ability to diagnose HCC as sensitivity takes priority over specificity in surveillance ( 36 , 37 ). For the diagnosis of early-stage HCC, AFP-L3% is not recommended because of the need for an elevated AFP level, which limits its effectiveness; while AFP-L3% may serve as a supplementary for AFP, highly sensitive AFP-L3% measurements are region-restricted and costly ( 38 , 39 ). As such, we constructed the ASAP score excluding AFP-L3% because the measurement of this marker is complex, time-consuming, expensive, and requires up to a 400-μL volume of serum sample; in addition, the contribution of AFP-L3% to risk prediction of HCC was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the most frequently used cut-off value (10%), AFP-L3% has a specificity of 99.4% with a low sensitivity of 18.8%, indicating a poor ability to diagnose HCC as sensitivity takes priority over specificity in surveillance ( 36 , 37 ). For the diagnosis of early-stage HCC, AFP-L3% is not recommended because of the need for an elevated AFP level, which limits its effectiveness; while AFP-L3% may serve as a supplementary for AFP, highly sensitive AFP-L3% measurements are region-restricted and costly ( 38 , 39 ). As such, we constructed the ASAP score excluding AFP-L3% because the measurement of this marker is complex, time-consuming, expensive, and requires up to a 400-μL volume of serum sample; in addition, the contribution of AFP-L3% to risk prediction of HCC was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current international guidelines recommend HCC screening among high-risk individuals, including patients with chronic HBV infection or cirrhosis 21,22 . However, the effectiveness of HCC screening is hampered by the lack of highly sensitive, specific, and efficient tools 11,23 .…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HCC may be diagnosed with non-invasive methods such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and serum biomarkers while invasive methods such as biopsy not recommended for all lesions for fear of increasing the risk of tumor seeding and bleeding, and false-negative result due to obtain tissue from an inappropriate site, AASLD recommends biopsy only in lesions not typical for HCC on contrast-enhanced imaging (4) .…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced imaging studies or Biopsy are not reliable methods for screening and surveillance of HCC due to their costeffectiveness, time consumption, not being available at every center and intraoperative error, so serum tumor markers such as AFP are the most common method used in the surveillance and early detection of HCC in cirrhotic patients (4) .…”
Section: Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hcc)mentioning
confidence: 99%