2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and emerging trends in polymeric 3D printed microfluidic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
73
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 258 publications
0
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the fact that it allows for building complex structures with customized geometries in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner, 3D printing has increasingly been regarded as an advantageous method for producing microfluidic platforms. Compared to traditional manufacturing techniques, 3D printing offers a flexible fabricating alternative with fewer steps, suitable for rapid prototyping, while also enabling on-demand production of parts from different materials with high microscale precision [ 2 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Moreover, the flexibility of direct 3D printing also facilitates linking micromixer modules, increasing the versatility and functionality of final devices [ 37 , 95 , 96 ].…”
Section: Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the fact that it allows for building complex structures with customized geometries in a simple, fast, and low-cost manner, 3D printing has increasingly been regarded as an advantageous method for producing microfluidic platforms. Compared to traditional manufacturing techniques, 3D printing offers a flexible fabricating alternative with fewer steps, suitable for rapid prototyping, while also enabling on-demand production of parts from different materials with high microscale precision [ 2 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 ]. Moreover, the flexibility of direct 3D printing also facilitates linking micromixer modules, increasing the versatility and functionality of final devices [ 37 , 95 , 96 ].…”
Section: Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic technology has attracted increasing scientific interest in the last decades, gaining attention for numerous applications, especially in the fields of chemistry and biology [ 1 , 2 ]. Based on the use of miniaturized devices with channels and chambers of tens to hundreds of micrometers, microfluidic technology enables highly precise fluid manipulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 More importantly, due to the ever-improving resolution of 3D printers, 3D printing technology allows the fabrication of microuidic devices with true micro-scale channel dimensions (#20 mm), progressing closer to the conventional technologies such as so lithography. 21,22 Numerous exciting 3D-printed microuidics have been recently reported. 16,23 Some of the examples of 3D printed microuidics that have been developed include electrodes for electroanalytical analyses, 24 3D cell culture microuidic devices, 25 droplet-based microuidics, 26 gradient generators, 27 as well as transparent and quantitative microuidic devices for sample analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 More importantly, due to the ever-improving resolution of 3D printers, 3D printing technology allows the fabrication of microfluidic devices with true micro-scale channel dimensions (≤20 μm), progressing closer to the conventional technologies such as soft lithography. 21,22…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D printing is one of the disruptive technologies in the micro uidics eld. It speeds up the molding fabrication and makes it feasible for direct micro uidic fabrication without polymer casting, owing to the high availability of the various resin types in the market [19][20][21][22][23]. Among the number of distinctive printing techniques, such as laser sintering, fused lament, and an inkjet-based 3D printer, resin stereolithography emanates as a potential fabrication pathway of 3D printing because of its high resolution, good surface nishing, and considerably low expenses per printed device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%