2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and Emerging Water Main Renewal Technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PE liner used for structural reinforcement of water pipelines must meet AWWA Class II. Therefore, determining the appropriate liner thickness is crucial (Matthews et al 2013;AWWA 2014). Depending on the pipe diameter and thickness, the PE pipe can be designed as AWWA Class IV or higher to replace the structural performance of the host pipe.…”
Section: Minimum Liner Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PE liner used for structural reinforcement of water pipelines must meet AWWA Class II. Therefore, determining the appropriate liner thickness is crucial (Matthews et al 2013;AWWA 2014). Depending on the pipe diameter and thickness, the PE pipe can be designed as AWWA Class IV or higher to replace the structural performance of the host pipe.…”
Section: Minimum Liner Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The failure was attributed to moisture conditions which prevented a proper chemical reaction from occurring, resulting in a lining collapse. The product was removed from the market for further research and development and reintroduced using a new formula the following year (Matthews et al 2012b(Matthews et al , 2013(Matthews et al , 2014Selvakumar et al 2015).…”
Section: Demonstration #1 In Somerville Njmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of diameter) for the lining, and it resulted in a field applied carbon footprint of 23,986 kg (52,880 lb) of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), as calculated with the e-Calc tool (Sihabuddin and Ariaratnam 2009). The CO 2 footprint was estimated to be approximately half of the CO 2 from a similar sized open cut excavation project (if feasible) (Matthews et al 2012a(Matthews et al , 2013(Matthews et al , 2014Selvakumar et al 2015). This indicates an open cut excavation project of a 150-mm (6-in.)…”
Section: Demonstration #2 In Cleveland Ohiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments of strengthening methods have attracted great attention. To strengthen deteriorating pipes, comprehensive strengthening methods have been proposed such as the replacement (Zhang et al, 2017), internal strengthening methods (such as relining (Smith and Bruny, 2004;Ambroziak et al, 2010;Matthews et al, 2013), slip-lining (Rahman et al, 2012), and carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) (Dou et al, 2017a;Dou et al, 2017b;Dou et al, 2018)), and external strengthening methods (Elnakhat and Raymond, 2006). Strengthening with external prestressed strands is prominent, given that draining the pipeline is non-essential for construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%