2002
DOI: 10.1136/heart.87.6.497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current and future relevance of guidelines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, as highlighted in our previous report (Cumming et al. 2001), guidelines are meant solely to guide but not dictate management, and we are in agreement with Klein (2002) as any attempt to standardize care ignores the heterogeneity of patients and the complexity of medical decisions. Each case therefore must always be considered individually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, as highlighted in our previous report (Cumming et al. 2001), guidelines are meant solely to guide but not dictate management, and we are in agreement with Klein (2002) as any attempt to standardize care ignores the heterogeneity of patients and the complexity of medical decisions. Each case therefore must always be considered individually.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Similarly, the evidence in favour of prophylactic surgery for unaffected HNPCC gene carriers is lacking, and therefore not generally recommended (Lindor et al 2006). Nevertheless, as highlighted in our previous report (Cumming et al 2001), guidelines are meant solely to guide but not dictate management, and we are in agreement with Klein (2002) as any attempt to standardize care ignores the heterogeneity of patients and the complexity of medical decisions. Each Multiple primary cancers © 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd case therefore must always be considered individually.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In fact, several recent studies found that the methodological quality of clinical guidelines was highly variable. The problem is that there are many poor-quality CPGs that are not based on the best evidence [4], [5], [6]. Therefore, assessing the quality of CPGs using formal methods is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A = Aspirin and ACE inhibitors (ARBs) B = Beta blockers and blood pressure C = Cholesterol, cigarettes, clopidogrel D = Diet for weight control and diabetes E = Education and exercise I believe that guidelines are useful to help make clinical judgments and thus improve the quality of patient care. 5 However, the astute clinician will recognize that standardizing care may not be appropriate in every patient because of the heterogeneous nature of the patients being treated. In addition, guidelines are not static documents, and they must be continuously updated as new information evolves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%