2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current antimicrobial susceptibility testing for beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical settings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the molecular analysis of antibiotic resistance genes could not be performed due to insufficient financial resources. In order to detect resistance by phenotypic tests, the standard two-step algorithm was performed consisting of (i) initial screening with antibiotic containing media, and (ii) further evaluation using a confirmatory test [44]. This strategy generally gives accurate results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the molecular analysis of antibiotic resistance genes could not be performed due to insufficient financial resources. In order to detect resistance by phenotypic tests, the standard two-step algorithm was performed consisting of (i) initial screening with antibiotic containing media, and (ii) further evaluation using a confirmatory test [44]. This strategy generally gives accurate results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (Augmentin), Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime, Ceftriaxone and Aztreonam were the antibiotic discs utilized. All Augmentin resistant enterobacteria and one third generation cephalosporin were seen in this study as the producers of ESBL (Pereckaite et al, 2018).…”
Section: Antimicrobial Assaysmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, optimal use of these new and expensive anti-infective agents requires knowledge of the mechanism of carbapenem resistance in the target organism. Yet, published data suggest that differentiation among beta-lactamase classes in CPOs often is not performed ( Lutgring and Limbago, 2016 ; Miller et al., 2017 ; Burnham et al., 2017 ; Pereckaite et al., 2018 ). The underutilization of these tests is a critical problem for optimal use of the newer antimicrobial agents globally.…”
Section: Differentiating Among Ambler Classes Of Carbapenem-resistance Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reasons why laboratories may be reluctant to use molecular tests to detect CPOs and differentiate among CRG classes in resistant bacterial isolates. The cost of the tests is often cited as an issue, especially for the genotypic assays ( Burnham et al., 2017 ; Pereckaite et al., 2018 ) but the reluctance to use molecular tests clearly goes beyond this issue as syndromic test panels are broadly used in clinical microbiology laboratories despite their increased costs over traditional identification methods ( Dien Bard and McElvania, 2020 ). For many laboratories in the United States, there is a sense that differentiation among CRG is simply unnecessary, as it is presumed that CPOs are likely to be KPC-producers ( Miller et al., 2017 ).…”
Section: Reluctance To Using Molecular Diagnostic Tests For Cpo Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation