2023
DOI: 10.15441/ceem.23.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current challenges in adopting machine learning to critical care and emergency medicine

Abstract: Over the past decades, the field of machine learning (ML) has made great strides in medicine. Despite the number of ML-inspired publications in the clinical arena, the results and implications are not readily accepted at the bedside. Although ML is very powerful in deciphering hidden patterns in complex critical care and emergency medicine data, various factors including data, feature generation, model design, performance assessment, and limited implementation could affect the utility of the research. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study focused on widely used, rule-based models in intensive care for future modification and development. Machine-learning-based prediction models have been developed in emergency and critical care settings and can be considered among the solutions for improving the prognostic performance across ICU types, although there are still barriers for adopting machine-learning models in clinical practice [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study focused on widely used, rule-based models in intensive care for future modification and development. Machine-learning-based prediction models have been developed in emergency and critical care settings and can be considered among the solutions for improving the prognostic performance across ICU types, although there are still barriers for adopting machine-learning models in clinical practice [36,37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, only few AI-based algorithms have shown evidence for improved clinician performance or patient outcomes in clinical studies [ 6 , 16 , 17 ]. Reasons proposed for this so-called AI chasm [ 18 ] are lack of necessary expertise needed for translating a tool into practice, lack of funding available for translation, underappreciation of clinical research as a translation mechanism, disregard for the potential value of the early stages of clinical evaluation and the analysis of human factors [ 19 ], and poor reporting and evaluations [ 2 , 8 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are powerful technologies that have the potential to improve medical care [ 1 ]. AI refers to the broader concept of technology being able to carry out tasks in an autonomous and smart way, encompassing a variety of technologies, while ML is a subset of AI focused on the idea that machines can learn from data, identify patterns, and make decisions with minimal human intervention [ 1 4 ]. Particularly in emergency medicine, AI and ML are expected to play critical roles in accelerating triage, diagnosis, and prognostication to optimize individual patient care through the input of clinical information and/or image recognition [ 2 , 4 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI refers to the broader concept of technology being able to carry out tasks in an autonomous and smart way, encompassing a variety of technologies, while ML is a subset of AI focused on the idea that machines can learn from data, identify patterns, and make decisions with minimal human intervention [ 1 4 ]. Particularly in emergency medicine, AI and ML are expected to play critical roles in accelerating triage, diagnosis, and prognostication to optimize individual patient care through the input of clinical information and/or image recognition [ 2 , 4 8 ]. Furthermore, streamlined clinical documentation or recording using natural language processing is expected to make these tasks more efficient [ 9 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%