2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10896-016-9862-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Controversies within Intimate Partner Violence: Overlooking Bidirectional Violence

Abstract: There is a wealth of research that details the bidirectional nature of the majority of intimate partner violence (IPV; Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Misra, Selwyn & Rohling, 2012). However, there is a tendency for interventions to treat perpetrators and victims unilaterally from a gendered standpoint. The current paper discusses the evidence to date that illustrates the extent of the problem including frequency within several samples, and the severity of outcomes. It further argues that the only way to develop effec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
67
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For many years, research and services implicitly assumed that women were primarily victims and men were almost exclusively perpetrators of IPV [81,82]. This approach has been challenged more recently [18], yet male victimization is still rarely addressed in LMIC.…”
Section: Fourth and Finally Our Findings Are A Reminder That Boys Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, research and services implicitly assumed that women were primarily victims and men were almost exclusively perpetrators of IPV [81,82]. This approach has been challenged more recently [18], yet male victimization is still rarely addressed in LMIC.…”
Section: Fourth and Finally Our Findings Are A Reminder That Boys Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lawrence et al, 2009;Renner et al, 2014) . This distinction holds important implications as it presents contextual information to further understand the abuse and the nature of it; this is information that should be integrated into intervention strategies (Bates, 2016). The dyadic nature means understanding individual motivations as well as relationship dynamics which are critical in understanding the meaning of the violence.…”
Section: Victimisation Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop effective interventions, it is necessary to know the nature of IPV (subtype of unidirectional or bidirectional violence), and this requires knowledge of the context in which the violence occurs or motivations for violence perpetration. Different intervention models may be required in cases where perpetrators are also victims of IPV, when males are exclusively the perpetrators or exclusively victims [53].…”
Section: Directionality Of Inter-parental Violence Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%