2001
DOI: 10.1063/1.1424065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current crowding in InAsSb light-emitting diodes

Abstract: High-resolution two-dimensional infrared (IR) imaging of dynamic electronic processes in the surface-emitting p-InAsSb/n-InAsSbP light-emitting diodes (LEDs) (λ=4.3 μm, T>300 K) showed that forward current crowding drastically decreases efficiency of LEDs with point contacts. Current flows and IR emittance “forget” the emitting area size and geometry, whereas extended areas far off the point contacts become even “darker” with the current increase. Contrary to this, the reverse bias causes remarkable cur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, shortcomings are related to the removal of heat, 3 which is due to the JH of the structure and increased rate of nonradiative Auger recombination of injected charge carriers. In our opinion, the appearance of the current crowding ͑CC͒ effect, 4 which is rarely mentioned in AlGaAs/GaAs structures 5 but is well established in less efficient blueshifted [6][7][8] and redshifted [9][10][11][12] LEDs, should also be considered. This effect is due to the localization of the current flow rout in some regions of a multilayer LED structure whose position and geometry are difficult to predict a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, shortcomings are related to the removal of heat, 3 which is due to the JH of the structure and increased rate of nonradiative Auger recombination of injected charge carriers. In our opinion, the appearance of the current crowding ͑CC͒ effect, 4 which is rarely mentioned in AlGaAs/GaAs structures 5 but is well established in less efficient blueshifted [6][7][8] and redshifted [9][10][11][12] LEDs, should also be considered. This effect is due to the localization of the current flow rout in some regions of a multilayer LED structure whose position and geometry are difficult to predict a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current crowding effect is well known in LEDs operating in both visible (based on InGaN [1] and AlGaInP [2]) and IR (InAsSb [3]) spectral intervals. Several investigations have been devoted to numerical simulation [4,5] and analytical modeling [1,6,7] of current spreading in LEDs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the negative luminescence mode 17 , practically all junction area remains active (see inset in Fig.3 and Fig.6, d). This is due to high junction resistance (in respect to the emitter resistance) that contributes to the current spreading across all active LED region 18 . It is very important that combining forward and reverse bias evidences unique IR LED propertythe ability to simulate hot or cold target and low observable with respect to a particular background.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More details are show in Fig.3 where the filling factor (F) of emitting surface (conditionally determined as the part of an active surface where T a values exceed 80% of the maximum) is plotted against the forward current. It is the CC that makes the emitted light to concentrate symmetrically around the top contact and "forget" a device geometry 18,19 . Longer the λ p smaller is the filling factor by decreasing from 10% (λ p = 3.4 µm) to ~1.5% (λ p = 4.2 µm).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation