Purpose
To study the clinical benefit of low-level light therapy when associated with intense pulsed light for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction.
Methods
An observational comparative study. Sixty-two (62) subjects were assigned 1:1 to one of two treatment arms: group 1 (31 subjects, 62 eyes), intense pulsed light followed by low-level light and group 2 (31 subjects, 62 eyes) intense pulsed light alone. In both groups, treatments were performed in 3 sessions and subjects were evaluated at baseline and 3 weeks after the last treatment session. Values are shown as Δ = mean difference ± standard deviation.
Results
We observed a significant improvement is OSDI-12 score and lipid layer thickness, in both groups (Δ=-22.7 ± 17.5, p < 0.001 in group 1 and Δ=-23.6 ± 23.8, p < 0.001 in group 2 for OSDI and Δ=+18.6 ± 37.0, p < 0.001 in group 1 and Δ=+19.9 ± 26.4, p < 0.001 in group 2 for lipid layer thickness). Despite no differences between groups at baseline (p = 0.469), only group 1 had a significant improvement in Schirmer test (Δ = + 1.6 ± 4.8, p = 0.009 in group 1 and Δ=+1.7 ± 6.9, p = 0.057 in group 2). No significant side effects were noted. No patient in any group felt subjectively “worse” after the treatment.
Conclusion
Intense pulsed light seems effective and safe for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction, improving symptoms and the tear film lipid layer. This study shows no strong evidence of the benefit of low-level light, but it shows weak evidence that it may further improve aqueous tear production.