2011
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2011.2104980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Distribution and Losses of Grouped Underground Cables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Novak et al established a grouped single-core underground cable model considering both ends of the twisted wire layer connected to the shield layer. They found that the induced current was an important factor causing current loss (Novak and Koller, 2011). Mohamed et al effectively reduced the maximum conductor temperature and surface flux density by installing a metal plate above an underground power cable line (Mohamed et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novak et al established a grouped single-core underground cable model considering both ends of the twisted wire layer connected to the shield layer. They found that the induced current was an important factor causing current loss (Novak and Koller, 2011). Mohamed et al effectively reduced the maximum conductor temperature and surface flux density by installing a metal plate above an underground power cable line (Mohamed et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy losses in cable lines depend on the nominal cross-section of the conductor and of the metallic screen, way of laying the cable (flat or trefoil formation), but also to a large extent, on the connection and earthing system of the cables' metallic screens [32,34,38,52]. The greater the distance between single-core cables, regardless of the thickness of individual conductors, the greater losses in these cable systems are observed, hence much greater losses will occur in the case of cables in a flat formation than in a trefoil formation [20,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater the distance between single-core cables, regardless of the thickness of individual conductors, the greater losses in these cable systems are observed, hence much greater losses will occur in the case of cables in a flat formation than in a trefoil formation [20,37]. If there is more than one cable system, for example two three-phase cables side by side, energy losses will also depend on the phase sequence in individual single-phase cables [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard IEC 60287 gives a theoretical method to calculate the current distribution between parallel cables with ignoring the proximity effects [3]. In [4], the authors investigate the cables currents and power losses division based on the standard method and FEM models in the cables under sinusoidal current. A method is used to determine the current of parallel cables using source voltage in sinusoidal current in [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%