1969
DOI: 10.1049/piee.1969.0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current distribution in sheet- and foil-wound transformers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evenly distributed parallelly connected low-voltage coils can be treated as a conductive foil. In [18][19][20], the current distribution in the low-voltage coil presented by a foil is much more similar to current distribution presented here than in [17]. The question arises, why is the current distribution in [17] so wavy?…”
Section: Table A1supporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evenly distributed parallelly connected low-voltage coils can be treated as a conductive foil. In [18][19][20], the current distribution in the low-voltage coil presented by a foil is much more similar to current distribution presented here than in [17]. The question arises, why is the current distribution in [17] so wavy?…”
Section: Table A1supporting
confidence: 65%
“…It can now be concluded that the real power P and reactive power Q in (20) can be expressed with the leakage impedance of all the transformer windings and winding currents.…”
Section: N2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the second order, whose solution[24] is too complicated for use in engineering design. Practically the same results, but much easier, had been obtained years earlier[25] using the well‐known deep‐slot theory (Figure 2).…”
Section: Data Generation and Validation Of Physical Pre‐processor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mullineux et al [7], El-Missiry [8], Ferreira [9], and Zúbek [10] have used analytical solutions to determine the current distribution and losses in foil windings; however, as already mentioned, these methods are based on simplified models, which are not usually sufficiently accurate and flexible for transformer design purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%