1984
DOI: 10.1063/1.864602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current drive and helicity injection

Abstract: Magnetic configurations with currents parallel to the magnetic field need means for current drive. The concepts of transport of helicity are found useful for considering methods for current drive. The paper describes a formalism for considering transport of helicity, methods of injection of helicity, and specific examples of arrangements for current drive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to cast the theory of relaxed states in a general form that illustrates the connection between different types of relaxed state (Jensen & Chu 1984;Taylor 1986). (Even though it is not a convenient way to study specific examples.…”
Section: General Theory Of Relaxed Toroidal Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to cast the theory of relaxed states in a general form that illustrates the connection between different types of relaxed state (Jensen & Chu 1984;Taylor 1986). (Even though it is not a convenient way to study specific examples.…”
Section: General Theory Of Relaxed Toroidal Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 In a freely expanding plasma, rapid increase in the toroidal flux modifies the rotational transform profile of the open field lines quickly and hence avoids locking to a primary eigenmode that could destroy the jet morphology at early stage of the expansion. If the plasma is indeed force-free and eventually Taylor relaxed, Jensen-Chu resonance 31 predicts a spheromak solution for the entire radio lobe. In a more realistic partially relaxed plasma, Jensen-Chu resonances are regularized and more complicated magnetic structures become accessible.…”
Section: -4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…equation (20) ff. of Jensen & Chu (1984)) and has a robust topological interpretation (see e.g. Berger (1999) for a heuristic review or Arnold & Khesin (1998) for a more mathematical treatment) the most robust of the remaining IMHD invariants is widely accepted to be the magnetic helicity 2µ 0 K Ω , where, Bhattacharjee & Dewar (1982), we define the invariant K Ω as…”
Section: Helicity Conservation and Taylor Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As tangential B is to be a holonomic constraint rather than a natural boundary condition, we do not treat A on the boundary as freely variable and can constrain χ. Thus we do not need to use either the Bevir-Gray (subtraction of products of toroidal and poloidal loop integrals, Bevir & Gray (1982)) or relative helicity (subtraction of vacuum-field helicity, Jensen & Chu (1984)) modifications of the helicity, the latter fact also implying there is no physical necessity to decompose the magnetic field into a vacuum (harmonic) and a plasma-current-generated component (though it may still be useful conceptually and mathematically, Yoshida & Giga (1990), Yoshida & Dewar (2012)). …”
Section: Helicity Conservation and Taylor Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%