2007
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-950x(2007)133:2(136)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Effects on Nonlinear Wave-Body Interactions by a 2D Fully Nonlinear Numerical Wave Tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the presented procedure leads to steady-state results that agree well with those from the full-updated Runge-Kutta method while the frozen-coefficient RungeKutta scheme does not give similar results even when the time step is as small as T/128. The results for the frozen-coefficient Runge-Kutta scheme also tends to be unstable as indicated in [23]. This clearly demonstrates that the ISITIMFB can alleviate the instability problem of the frozen-coefficient method and can be as accurate and robust as the full-updated Runge-Kutta method but without the need of multiple updating of fluid domain geometries and so of the coefficient matrix in one time step ; ISITIMFB and Fully updated Runge-Kutta method:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Force Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen, the presented procedure leads to steady-state results that agree well with those from the full-updated Runge-Kutta method while the frozen-coefficient RungeKutta scheme does not give similar results even when the time step is as small as T/128. The results for the frozen-coefficient Runge-Kutta scheme also tends to be unstable as indicated in [23]. This clearly demonstrates that the ISITIMFB can alleviate the instability problem of the frozen-coefficient method and can be as accurate and robust as the full-updated Runge-Kutta method but without the need of multiple updating of fluid domain geometries and so of the coefficient matrix in one time step ; ISITIMFB and Fully updated Runge-Kutta method:…”
Section: Comparison With Other Force Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…15. To consider the same case as in [23], the dimensionless incident wave height of 0.0025 and the time step are used here. As can be seen, the presented procedure leads to steady-state results that agree well with those from the full-updated Runge-Kutta method while the frozen-coefficient RungeKutta scheme does not give similar results even when the time step is as small as T/128.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Force Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations