2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current flow and pair creation at low altitude in rotation-powered pulsars’ force-free magnetospheres: space charge limited flow

Abstract: We report the results of an investigation of particle acceleration and electron-positron plasma generation at low altitude in the polar magnetic flux tubes of Rotation Powered Pulsars, when the stellar surface is free to emit whatever charges and currents are demanded by the forcefree magnetosphere. We apply a new 1D hybrid plasma simulation code to the dynamical problem, using Particle-in-Cell methods for the dynamics of the charged particles, including a determination of the collective electrostatic fluctuat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
201
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
10
201
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The accretion rate also defines the intensity of photon fields in the magnetosphere, and consequently, the density of electron-positron pairs produced through gamma-gamma interaction (see, e.g., Levinson & Rieger 2011). If the multiplicity parameter, κ, approaches unity, the gap electric field vanishes (see, e.g., Timokhin & Arons 2013). This sets an upper limit on the accretion rate, and consequently on the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: The Magnetospheric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accretion rate also defines the intensity of photon fields in the magnetosphere, and consequently, the density of electron-positron pairs produced through gamma-gamma interaction (see, e.g., Levinson & Rieger 2011). If the multiplicity parameter, κ, approaches unity, the gap electric field vanishes (see, e.g., Timokhin & Arons 2013). This sets an upper limit on the accretion rate, and consequently on the magnetic field strength.…”
Section: The Magnetospheric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latest E × B models (e.g. Timokhin & Arons 2013), the currents and potential differences in the magnetosphere can be asymmetric along the line of sight. van Leeuwen & Timokhin (2012) used this fact to explain the two different drift speeds seen in PSR B0826-34.…”
Section: Carousel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steady-state cascades yield pair multiplicities up to 10 4 [73] that are a strong function of pulsar period and surface magnetic-field strength. However, recent studies of time-dependent polar-cap pair cascades [149,150] . Pplar view of the current density distributions (current density j relative to the Goldreich-Julian current density jGJ) on the polar cap in a force-free magnetosphere for different pulsar inclination angles α B .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polar cap pair cascades do not take place on field lines where 0 < j/jGJ < 1 (gray areas), but are active on field lines where j/jGJ > 1 (blue) and j/jGJ < 0 (yellow/red). Adapted from [150].that the cascades are only steady-state for primary currents that are finely tuned to the Goldreich-Julian current, JGJ = ρGJc, where ρGJ = 2 0ΩB is the charge density necessary to screen E . Since the global MHD models find a range of currents across the polar cap, the pair cascades will in most cases be time variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%