1988
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767387011243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current flow in reflection electron microscopy and RHEED

Abstract: Application of simple Bloch-wave theory to reflection electron microscopy and diffraction leads to inconsistent results -there are not enough boundary conditions to generate a unique solution. To overcome this problem in the past the solution for a thick slab has been used instead of that for a single surface. It is shown that a simpler method valid for a single surface is to insist that only Bloch waves with current flow into or parallel to the crystal surface are allowed. Because of the equations of continui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To match waves at the boundary, tangential components of wave vectors satisfy However it has been pointed out by Marks and Ma (1988) that problems are encountered when the absorption effect is considered. In this case, the electron wave vector has an imaginary component, so that the exp[21li(Kz + gz + vi)D] factor damps very quickly, especially for a large slab thickness D. Thus Eqs.…”
Section: Bloch Wave Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To match waves at the boundary, tangential components of wave vectors satisfy However it has been pointed out by Marks and Ma (1988) that problems are encountered when the absorption effect is considered. In this case, the electron wave vector has an imaginary component, so that the exp[21li(Kz + gz + vi)D] factor damps very quickly, especially for a large slab thickness D. Thus Eqs.…”
Section: Bloch Wave Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The so-called evanescent wave is thus generated, and it propagates in a direction parallel or nearly parallel to the surface. An alternative method for finding a unique solution is to use the energy flow concept (Ma and Marks, 1989;Marks and Ma, 1988), which follows.…”
Section: Bloch Wave Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provided that the second surface is well separated from the first and that the crystal is absorbing this method will be perfectly valid. The second method, which has been briefly described in an earlier note (Marks & Ma, 1988a), is to use the current flow to obtain n boundary conditions. (We can use current Without absorption Eigenvalues Current flow 1 ( 0.733, 0"000) 0'381 2 (-0'733, 0"000) -0"382 3 ( 0"599, 0"000) 0"264 4 (-0"599, 0"000) -0"275 5 ( 0"354, 0"149) 0"000 6 ( 0"354,-0"149) 0"000 7 (-0"354, 0'149) 0"000 8 ( 0"245, 0"097) 0"000 9 ( 0.245, -0.097) 0.000 10 (-0.354,-0-149) 0"000 11 (-0"245, 0"097) 0"000 12 (-0"245,-0"097) 0"000 13 ( 0"000, 0-149) 0.000 14 ( 0"115, 0"054) 0.000 15 ( 0"000,-0"149) 0"000 16 ( 0'115, -0"054) 0"000 17 (-0"115, 0"054) 0"000 18 (-0"115,-0"054) 0"000 Table 1 The strongly excited evanescent waves outside the surface should be noted.…”
Section: Ke#o)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the problem of determining excited wave points, they considered the crystal as a slab which had a finite thickness. Very recently, we introduced the argument of current flow for the reflection case (Marks & Ma, 1988;Ma & Marks, 1989) and cleared up the confusion around the wave points in the band gap (evanescent wave) and the wave points which are not excited in the crystal and were able to solve the general n-beam problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%