1990
DOI: 10.1086/168214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current generation in extragalactic jets by Cherenkov damping of magnetohydrodynamic waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relativistic jets could be hydrodynamically collimated (26) or magnetohydrodynamically collimated (27). Little work has been done on magnetohydrodynamic collimation since our 1990 study (27).…”
Section: Challenge (6): Can Modified Gravity Explain Dark Energy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Relativistic jets could be hydrodynamically collimated (26) or magnetohydrodynamically collimated (27). Little work has been done on magnetohydrodynamic collimation since our 1990 study (27).…”
Section: Challenge (6): Can Modified Gravity Explain Dark Energy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed physics, however, of the accretion disk, in particular, its instabilities and nonlinear interactions and its connection with the jet and compact object, needs to be made. Relativistic jets could be hydrodynamically collimated (26) or magnetohydrodynamically collimated (27). Little work has been done on magnetohydrodynamic collimation since our 1990 study (27).…”
Section: Challenge (6): Can Modified Gravity Explain Dark Energy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The jet-like structure is highly collimated and includes filament structure, as well. A mechanism (MHD wave pumping) that produces an axial current which collimates the jets, has been suggested by Jafelice et al (1990). Gouveia Dal Pino and Opher ( , 1993 suggested that the filaments may be produced by a thermal instability.…”
Section: Relativistic Jetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume regular previous active (i.e., jet-current generation) periods, T act ^ f Ti nact (Ti nact Ξ inactive period), and that T act ^ Tj , the present jet age (taken as ^ 6x10" years). Jet current generation has recently been discussed by Jafelice et al (1989). We studied f= 1; 10"^; and 10 .…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%