2013
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/15/7/073034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-induced asymmetries of incompressible strips in narrow quantum Hall systems

Abstract: First, we present recent experimental results confirming previously predicted strong asymmetries of the current distribution in narrow Hall bars under conditions of the integer quantum Hall effect (IQHE). Then, using a previously developed self-consistent screening and transport theory of the IQHE, we investigate how these asymmetries, which are due to a nonlinear feedback effect of the imposed current on the electron distribution in the sample, depend on relevant parameters, such as strength of the imposed cu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Incompressible and compressible regions appear in the 2DES under high magnetic field due to electrostatic screening of superposed electrostatic potential variations, which are naturally present, especially towards the 2DES edges. Transport calculations taking such screening into account and assuming local equilibrium in stationary non-equilibrium states [14][15][16][17][18] show good agreement with the experimental findings. Moreover, Güven et al [14] also analyzed the Hall potential profiles for higher bias and predicted, for the regime with current near the edges, an asymmetric current distribution at both edges accompanied by different widths of the incompressible stripes carrying the current.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Incompressible and compressible regions appear in the 2DES under high magnetic field due to electrostatic screening of superposed electrostatic potential variations, which are naturally present, especially towards the 2DES edges. Transport calculations taking such screening into account and assuming local equilibrium in stationary non-equilibrium states [14][15][16][17][18] show good agreement with the experimental findings. Moreover, Güven et al [14] also analyzed the Hall potential profiles for higher bias and predicted, for the regime with current near the edges, an asymmetric current distribution at both edges accompanied by different widths of the incompressible stripes carrying the current.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…These calculations revealed a strongly nonlinear response behavior under the conditions of the IQHE, with a current-induced asymmetry between the ISs near opposite sample edges. These asymmetries were nicely confirmed by experiments [5,13] using unidirectional currents of different strengths. For sufficiently strong current, a breakdown of the IQHE was observed, which occurred as a continuous increase of the voltage drop inside the sample with increasing strength of the applied bias voltage, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This experimental situation can be simulated sufficiently well by the simple model of a relatively narrow (width 3 μm), translation-invariant Hall bar with a constant density of positive background charges, defining a confinement potential, which leads to an electron density profile decreasing monotonically from the center towards the edges of the bar. As B is increased towards the high-B part of the QHP, in this model the ISs become wider and move towards the center of the sample, so that the ASDC flows only through a narrow region in the middle of the Hall bar [13]. In the experiment, on the other hand, the high-B part of the QHP is 'bulk-dominated', since the ASDC is distributed over a wide region of the bulk of the Hall bar [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we extended our models to account for the effects of quadrupolar splitting of nuclear levels and also depict the electronic transport signatures that arise from single and multi-photon processes. We believe that this work sets stage for a more rigorous approach which will include a self-consistent solution of the potential profile [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] of the channel along with the spatial distribution the nuclear spin profile. In this section, we show that the rate of spin-flip scattering from the forward propagating up-spin (down-spin) channel originating in the source contact to the forward propagating down-spin (up-spin) channel terminating in the drain contact per unit energy at the QPC can indeed be approximated by a transmission coefficient that is dependent on the nuclear polarization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%