1974
DOI: 10.2307/1540461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CURRENT-INDUCED FLOW THROUGH THE SPONGE,HALICHONDRIA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, both species decreased their volume flow rate when ambient velocities reached a certain level, which may be to reduce damage caused by high currents or resuspension of sediments during storms (Gerrodette and Flechsig, 1979;Tompkins-MacDonald and Leys, 2008;Bannister et al, 2012). We suggest that the discrepancy in our results and those of Vogel, who first described the apparent use of induced current by sponges (Vogel, 1974(Vogel, , 1977, are due to his use of excurrent velocity rather than volume flow rate and the use of individual points in time rather than a full time series. The increased excurrent velocity recorded by Vogel (1977) in the species Amphimedon viridis (referred to as Haliclona viridis), Ircinia variabilis (referred to as Ircinia fasciculata) and Aplysina fistularis (referred to as Verongia fistularis) may have been behavioural responses, as shown here in C. delitrix in which contraction of the osculum caused increased excurrent (exit) velocity, but reduced volumetric flow rate as ambient currents increased.…”
Section: Ambient Currents Do Not Enhance Excurrent Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather, both species decreased their volume flow rate when ambient velocities reached a certain level, which may be to reduce damage caused by high currents or resuspension of sediments during storms (Gerrodette and Flechsig, 1979;Tompkins-MacDonald and Leys, 2008;Bannister et al, 2012). We suggest that the discrepancy in our results and those of Vogel, who first described the apparent use of induced current by sponges (Vogel, 1974(Vogel, , 1977, are due to his use of excurrent velocity rather than volume flow rate and the use of individual points in time rather than a full time series. The increased excurrent velocity recorded by Vogel (1977) in the species Amphimedon viridis (referred to as Haliclona viridis), Ircinia variabilis (referred to as Ircinia fasciculata) and Aplysina fistularis (referred to as Verongia fistularis) may have been behavioural responses, as shown here in C. delitrix in which contraction of the osculum caused increased excurrent (exit) velocity, but reduced volumetric flow rate as ambient currents increased.…”
Section: Ambient Currents Do Not Enhance Excurrent Velocitycontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…Cnidarians (Best, 1988), ascidians (Young and Braithwaite, 1980;Knott et al, 2004) and brachiopods (LaBarbera, 1977) also orient their bodies to the current, while other invertebrates may take advantage of current-induced flow through tubes (Vogel, 1977;Murdock and Vogel, 1978;von Dassow, 2005;Shiino, 2010). Sponges are often considered textbook examples of the use of current-induced flow in nature (Bidder, 1923;Vogel, 1974Vogel, , 1977 but experiments to confirm this have been equivocal (Leys et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enters the cavernous framework through flow speed differences in the BBL. The resulting pressure difference between the intake openings and the elevated output openings creates a secondary flow through the cavity system, much like the wind-induced ventilation of termite mounds (Weir 1973) or the current-induced flow through living sponges (Vogel 1974(Vogel , 1977. It should be noted that the direction of flow is not so important as the speed difference between intake and exhaust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This artifact is generated by higher ambient water velocities away from the boundary at the outlet of the sampler (Bernoulli effect, Vogel 1974). Various capping devices and configurations aimed to offset this effect were tested in the flow tank with no success.…”
Section: Ccd-v700e) Mounted In Front Of the Excurrent Model Was Used mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These attempts have relied mostly on the use of hot wire or hot film thermistors (Reiswig 1974;Vogel 1974Vogel , 1977Fiala-Medioni 1978a;Savarese et al 1997). These instruments allow a continuous record of excurrent velocity but estimates of water transport rates require additional information on aperture area and ambient flow (Fiala-Medioni 1978b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%