“…However, PNS is different from NMES/FES, as PNS is set to stimulate the peripheral nerves and results in a mass activation of innervated muscles, as well as antidromic neuronal impulses from stimulation site, which in our protocol is set to reach the spinal cord and corticomotoneuronal synapse ( Shulga et al, 2016a , Rodionov et al, 2020 , Rodionov et al, 2019 , Tolmacheva et al, 2019a , Tolmacheva et al, 2017 ). The effect of different kinds of PNS variants has been studied in chronic pain management ( Nayak and Banik 2018 ), in post-stroke motor impairment ( Carrico et al, 2016 ) and foremost, in subacute stages of SCI where PNS has been found to be useful in one study ( Lee et al, 2015 ). However, we have been using new PNS parameters in our PAS studies, where pulses are given at 50–100 Hz and the intensity is adjusted individually based on minimal intensity inducing F-responses to ensure the activation of the motor nerves ( Shulga et al, 2016a , Shulga et al, 2016b , Rodionov et al, 2020 , Rodionov et al, 2019 , Tolmacheva et al, 2019a , Tolmacheva et al, 2017 ).…”