2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current issues and uncertainties in the measurement and modelling of air–vegetation exchange and within-plant processing of POPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 202 publications
2
125
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of BFRs in the plants depends on the air concentrations and the partitioning between air and plant, in addition to various ambient variables such as wind speed, temperature, and humidity. 33 The relationships between concentrations in plant leaves and those in the gaseous phase, atmospheric particles, and LSPs and ambient variables were therefore investigated for individual BFRs separately (Table 2). BFRs in plants showed no clear relationships with the BFRs in the atmospheric particles with the exception of deca-BDE in eucalyptus leaves showing a significantly negative relationship (r = −0.67, p < 0.05).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of BFRs in the plants depends on the air concentrations and the partitioning between air and plant, in addition to various ambient variables such as wind speed, temperature, and humidity. 33 The relationships between concentrations in plant leaves and those in the gaseous phase, atmospheric particles, and LSPs and ambient variables were therefore investigated for individual BFRs separately (Table 2). BFRs in plants showed no clear relationships with the BFRs in the atmospheric particles with the exception of deca-BDE in eucalyptus leaves showing a significantly negative relationship (r = −0.67, p < 0.05).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although two studies from one group show the latter with better recoveries that the former, the opposite was seen by Ratola et al (2006). These differences may be due to the use of different pine species by both groups (P. sylvestris and P. pinea, respectively) and the still existing gaps and uncertainties pointed out by two reviews (Barber et al, 2004;Desalme et al, 2013) in the understanding of the air-vegetation partition of PAHs, despite the number of different models attempted for its description. Since the intention of the current work is to make a comparison between samples, the key concern is to have all of them passing through the same handling/extraction/quantification procedure, to avoid differences in the systematic errors associated.…”
Section: Sampling and Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cuticle consists of several lipid or lipid-like components including cutin, cutan, and extractable waxes that exhibit varying affinities for organic contaminants [1,4,5]. It is also possible, but less likely to be significant for neutral hydrophobic chemicals (1 < log 10 octanolwater partition coefficient [K OW ] < 8), that organic contaminants can sorb to the nonlipid organic matter fractions of leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%