2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Issues with Emergency Cardiac Ultrasound Probe and Image Conventions

Abstract: As emergency physicians (EPs) and other noncardiologists incorporate bedside ultrasound (US) and bedside echocardiography (echo) into their practice, confusion has resulted from the differing imaging conventions used by cardiac and general imaging. The author discusses the origin of these differences, current cardiac imaging conventions, and controversies in emergency medicine (EM) regarding adoption of imaging conventions. Also discussed in detail are specific echo windows and experience with different approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8 For images in this article, we will use an emergency medicine convention for cardiac imaging with the probe marker oriented to the patient's right, which keeps the anatomic right on the screen-left, as is the convention for other US imaging. 9 This is in contrast with image and probe orientation utilized in traditional cardiologyperformed US, but has been recognized as an accepted convention that we find to be conceptually easier, particularly when performing EP FOCUS as part of an integrated examination such as the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) or the rapid US for shock and hypotension. 3,6 As has been discussed previously in the emergency US literature, EP FOCUS is not intended to replace comprehensive echocardiography (echo) when more thorough cardiology evaluation is indicated.…”
Section: Approach To Exammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…6,8 For images in this article, we will use an emergency medicine convention for cardiac imaging with the probe marker oriented to the patient's right, which keeps the anatomic right on the screen-left, as is the convention for other US imaging. 9 This is in contrast with image and probe orientation utilized in traditional cardiologyperformed US, but has been recognized as an accepted convention that we find to be conceptually easier, particularly when performing EP FOCUS as part of an integrated examination such as the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) or the rapid US for shock and hypotension. 3,6 As has been discussed previously in the emergency US literature, EP FOCUS is not intended to replace comprehensive echocardiography (echo) when more thorough cardiology evaluation is indicated.…”
Section: Approach To Exammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To obtain the cardiac windows, there are 3 different orientations commonly used in the ED. 1 One such technique maintains the indicator on the left side of the screen, as is the orientation for other POCUS applications. For the parasternal long-axis view, the transducer is placed perpendicular to the chest wall, immediately left of the sternum between the third and fourth intercostal space.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac, Including Inferior Vena Cava [32][33][34][35][36][37] For the assessment of patients with cardiopulmonary complaints and undifferentiated shock, performance of a focused cardiac ultrasound examination can assist in narrowing the differential diagnosis. Focused cardiac ultrasound may identify the presence or absence of pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade, left ventricular dysfunction, right ventricular strain, and thoracic aortic dilatation.…”
Section: Infection Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%