2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current management of acute myocardial infarction: Experience from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry

Abstract: The Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) was the first nationwide, population-based, multicenter data collection registry in Korea designed to track outcomes of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The registry included 51 community and teaching hospitals and contained data on 14,870 patients through January 2008. Patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction had a higher prevalence of co-morbidities and worse outcome than patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,15) Also, in the KAMIR, 12-month mortality was similar in both STE-MI and NSTEMI patients. 16) How about the prognosis in NSTEMI patients with TO of the culprit artery? Should NSTEMI patients with TO in the IRA be considered STEMIequivalents?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15) Also, in the KAMIR, 12-month mortality was similar in both STE-MI and NSTEMI patients. 16) How about the prognosis in NSTEMI patients with TO of the culprit artery? Should NSTEMI patients with TO in the IRA be considered STEMIequivalents?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 In brief, the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and the Korea Working Group on Myocardial Infarction registry were established in November 2005, with support from the Korean Society of Cardiology, for prospective, open, observational, multicenter studies of AMI, including assessment of clinical outcomes. Fifty-five cardiac centers in Korea participated in establishing the database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registry included 52 community and university hospitals capable of primary PCI with one-year clinical follow up. Data was collected at each site by a well-trained study coordinator based on a standardized protocol 6-8)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%