Background
The 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile infection (CDI) treatment guideline update recommended first-line treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin for initial and recurrent CDI episodes. We aimed to examine outpatient CDI treatment utilization and outcomes pre-post the guideline update and compare clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin use.
Methods
A pre-post observational study design was employed using Medicare claims data. First-line CDI treatment utilization and clinical outcomes (4-/8-week sustained response, and CDI recurrence rates) were compared between patients indexed with CDI from Apr-Sep 2017 (pre-guideline period) and those indexed from Apr-Sep 2018 (post-guideline period). Clinical outcomes associated with use of fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin were compared using propensity-score matched analyses. All analyses were conducted in patient cohorts with initial or recurrent CDI.
Results
From the pre- to post-guideline period, metronidazole use decreased (initial CDI: 81.2%-53.5%; recurrent CDI: 49.7%-27.6%) while vancomycin (initial CDI:17.9%-44.9%; recurrent CDI: 48.1%-66.4%) and fidaxomicin (initial CDI: 0.87%-1.63%; recurrent CDI: 2.2%-6.0%) use increased significantly (p < 0.001 for all). However, clinical outcomes did not improve in the post-period. In propensity-score matched analyses, fidaxomicin vs. vancomycin users had 4-week sustained response rates that were higher by 13.5% (95% CI: 4.0-22.9, p = 0.0058) and 30.0% (95% CI: 16.8-44.3, p = 0.0002) in the initial and recurrent CDI cohorts, respectively. Although not statistically significant, recurrence rates were numerically lower for fidaxomicin in both cohorts.
Conclusions
There was considerable increase in vancomycin use and decrease in metronidazole use after the 2017 guideline update. Fidaxomicin use increased but remained low. Improved outcomes associated with fidaxomicin relative to vancomycin suggest benefits from its greater use in Medicare patients.