2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2015.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current models of the marmoset brain

Abstract: Since the availability of the common marmoset monkey as a primate model in neuroscience research has recently increased, much effort has been made to develop a reliable guide of the brain structures of this species. In this article, we review the development of the marmoset brain atlas and discuss a newly developed brain model, which was reconstructed from histological sections under volume-rendering technology. This kind of brain model allows virtual sections to be constructed on any axis, with nomenclatural … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary modality of the template is a Nissl-stained volume, which can be virtually cross-sectioned in any plane. The main noticeable difference from the previously available histology-based templates (Hashikawa et al, 2015;Majka et al, 2016;Woodward et al, 2018) is its isotropic nature. The averaging resulted in suppression of the artifacts and noise inherent to the histological processing of the individual hemispheres used to generate the template, in particular those related to the separation between sections (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The primary modality of the template is a Nissl-stained volume, which can be virtually cross-sectioned in any plane. The main noticeable difference from the previously available histology-based templates (Hashikawa et al, 2015;Majka et al, 2016;Woodward et al, 2018) is its isotropic nature. The averaging resulted in suppression of the artifacts and noise inherent to the histological processing of the individual hemispheres used to generate the template, in particular those related to the separation between sections (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hikishima et al, 2011 ) while other attempt to combine imaging techniques with traditional histology (e.g. Hashikawa et al, 2015 ). Using a population-based brain atlas as a template may increase the normalization accuracy in the present technique, and make further quantitative analyses, particularly with respect to the margin of error of the procedure, more reliable.…”
Section: Limiting Factors and Proposed Future Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A computational routine was established to perform this process automatically for all brain sections (Lee, Tward, et al, 2018). Briefly, in 6 animals where ex vivo pre-sectioning MRI of the brains were available, the Nissl stack was reconstructed by a series of jointly optimized rigid motions using the MRI as a guide, and the resulting reconstructed stack was diffeomorphically registered to the marmoset brain atlas (Hashikawa et al, 2015). In the 2 animals (M820, M822) where MRI guidance was unavailable, reconstruction was performed using the atlas as a shape prior and accounting for intrinsic shape differences (Lee, Lin, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Cross-modality Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%