Current national availability of advanced echocardiography imaging: real world data from an Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging survey

Abstract

Aims Advanced echocardiographic imaging (AEI) techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) and multi-chamber speckle-tracking deformation imaging (strain) analysis, have been shown to be more accurate in assessing heart chamber geometry and function when compared with conventional echocardiography providing additional prognostic value. However, incorporating AEI alongside standard examinations may be heterogeneous between echo laboratories (echo labs). Thus, our goal was to gain a better understanding of the many AEI modalities that are available and employed in Italy. Methods and results The Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey over a month (November 2022) to describe the use of AEI in Italy. Data were retrieved via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire uploaded on the SIECVI website. Data obtained from 173 echo labs were divided into 3 groups, according to the numbers of echocardiograms performed: <250 exams (low-volume activity, 53 centres), between 251 and 550 exams (moderate-volume activity, 62 centres), and ≥550 exams (high-volume activity, 58 centres). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) 3D was in use in 75% of centres with a consistent difference between low (55%), medium (71%), and high activity volume (85%) (P = 0.002), while 3D transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was in use in 84% of centres, reaching the 95% in high activity volume echo labs (P = 0.006). In centres with available 3D TTE, it was used for the left ventricle (LV) analysis in 67%, for the right ventricle (RV) in 45%, and for the left atrium (LA) in 40%, showing greater use in high-volume centres compared with low- and medium-volume centres (all P < 0.04). Strain analysis was utilized in most echo labs (80%), with a trend towards greater use in high-volume centres than low- and medium-volume centres (77%, 74%, and 90%, respectively; P = 0.08). In centres with available strain analysis, it was mainly employed for the LV (80%) and much less frequently for the RV and LA (49% and 48%, respectively). Conclusion In Italy, the AEI modalities are more frequently available in centres with high-volume activity but employed only in a few applications, being more frequent in analysing the LV compared with the RV and LA. Therefore, the echocardiography community and SIECVI should promote uniformity and effective training across the Italian centres. Meanwhile, collaborations across centres with various resources and expertise should be encouraged to use the benefits of the AEI.