1996
DOI: 10.1016/0921-4534(96)00322-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current noise in HTC polycrystalline superconductors a comparison between experiments and different types of percolation models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a circumstance, the distribution of the intergranular magnetic field in the interior of the superconducting specimen is determined by its intergranular features. This was the main difference of this transport method as compared with previous studies under stationary conditions of temperature and applied magnetic fields [8,9], or excitation current and applied magnetic fields [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In such a circumstance, the distribution of the intergranular magnetic field in the interior of the superconducting specimen is determined by its intergranular features. This was the main difference of this transport method as compared with previous studies under stationary conditions of temperature and applied magnetic fields [8,9], or excitation current and applied magnetic fields [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Alternative models to explain the noise produced in high Tc superconductors, both in stationary or non stationary conditions, are based on density fluctuations of fluxoids, moving in a matrix of pinning points [3][4][5]. According to these models, the noise produced during the transition is expected to be not much different from the l/f noise detected in stationary condition, and its intensity to be dependent on the fact that the resistive transition is produced by slowly varying the temperature in the absence of a magnetic field, or by producing the transition at constant temperature by applying a variable magnetic field.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to this noise component there is also a 1/f component which has a different origin, as pointed out in the previous section. According to the model briefly described above, the 1/f 2 spectral component is generated by a series of random steps of the electrical resistance during its increase or decrease by effect of a varying current or field, while the 1/f component may be generated by resistance fluctuations due to reversible transitions between superconductive and resistive state of those weak links which are near to a critical state, induced by temperature fluctuations [12,13,14,15]. In a different situation, when weak links do not play an important role, the noise may be predominantly generated by fluxoids motion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%