2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00304-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 IUDs remain an underutilized method of contraception in the United States despite their well established safety and efficacy. 46 Evidence supports the use of IUDs as a first-line contraceptive option. 2,7,8 The low rates of IUD use in the United States may be in part influenced by provider misconception about appropriate candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 IUDs remain an underutilized method of contraception in the United States despite their well established safety and efficacy. 46 Evidence supports the use of IUDs as a first-line contraceptive option. 2,7,8 The low rates of IUD use in the United States may be in part influenced by provider misconception about appropriate candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have demonstrated safety and efficacy of the IUD (Beatty & Blumenthal, 2009; Kulier, O’Brien, Helmerhorst, Usher-Patel, & D’Arcangues, 2007; O’Brien, Kulier, Helmerhorst, Usher-Patel, & d’Arcangues, 2008; Rivera & Best, 2002). Safety and efficacy also have been established in women undergoing immediate postabortion IUD insertion, with similarly low rates of perforation and pelvic inflammatory disease when compared with interval insertions (Grimes, Lopez, Schulz, & Stanwood, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%