2021
DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2021.713681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology: An Overview

Abstract: Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and myriad related techniques are becoming ever more commonplace throughout industry and society, and radiology is by no means an exception. It is essential for every radiologists of every subspecialty to gain familiarity and confidence with these techniques as they become increasingly incorporated into the routine practice in both academic and private practice settings. In this article, we provide a brief review of several definitions and techniques that are commonly… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Availability of a pediatric-specific model is preferred over applying existing the pre-trained models generated based on adult brain tumors, as the structure and MR image signal intensities vary largely in pediatric cohorts with developing brains. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Availability of a pediatric-specific model is preferred over applying existing the pre-trained models generated based on adult brain tumors, as the structure and MR image signal intensities vary largely in pediatric cohorts with developing brains. 16 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9–14 Such models do not generalize well to PBTs 15 due to the different radiological appearance of tumors compared to adult brain tumors, and the anatomical differences as a result of the developing brain in children. 16 A few studies have proposed different DL solutions to the PBT segmentation problem, with whole tumor Dice scores ranging between 0.68 and 0.76. 17–20 These approaches show lower performance than the models proposed for adult brain tumor segmentation, are often only designed for a particular histology, only segment the whole tumor without subregions, or segment the tumors based on one or two MRI sequences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed brain extraction model achieved Dice score of ≥0.97 on all data subsets, confirming its reproducible and generalizable performance to the unseen data from internal and external cohorts. Availability of a pediatric-specific model is preferred over applying existing the pre-trained models generated based on adult brain tumors, as the structure and MR image signal intensities vary largely in pediatric cohorts with developing brains 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current state-of-the-art approach for automated brain tumor segmentation is deep learning (DL); however, most available auto-segmentation tools have been trained and made available for use in adult cancers only [9][10][11][12][13][14] . Such models do not generalize well to PBTs 15 due to the different radiological appearance of tumors compared to adult brain tumors, and the anatomical differences as a result of the developing brain in children 16 . A few studies have proposed different DL solutions to the PBT segmentation problem, with whole tumor Dice scores ranging between 0.68-0.76 [17][18][19][20] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, lack of new lesions in the CNS is a key indicator of medication effectiveness 5 . Monitoring these lesions, however, is often monotonous and repetitive for neuroradiologists 6 , and this combined with radiology’s supply-demand challenges 7 has led to increased interest in methods for automating lesion detection 8 . Over the past two decades, research has heavily focused on computer-assisted segmentation methods 8 , with a recent surge in AI methodologies 9 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%