2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2006.00075.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Practice of Ultrasound‐Assisted Regional Anesthesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, only the anterior division, with a reported visibility rate of 100% [5], needs to be identified and a single injection was enough to achieve successful blockade in 96% of cases, possibly reducing performance time and patient discomfort. Second, because of its superficial location [8], the high-frequency probe rather than the low frequency one could be utilized to improve the resolution of the image at the expense of lower penetration [9]. Finally, because the Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, only the anterior division, with a reported visibility rate of 100% [5], needs to be identified and a single injection was enough to achieve successful blockade in 96% of cases, possibly reducing performance time and patient discomfort. Second, because of its superficial location [8], the high-frequency probe rather than the low frequency one could be utilized to improve the resolution of the image at the expense of lower penetration [9]. Finally, because the Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…20 Sonographically guided injection of local anesthetic may improve the success rate of the local anesthetic blockade, while at the same time decreasing the incidence of complications. 21 One recent review has confirmed the effective value of sonographically guided blockade of the LFCN. 8 In conclusion, sonographic imaging of the LFCN is possible in the groin and may become a screening test in MP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] The success of neuraxial anesthetic techniques depends ultimately on a very accurate assessment of the spine. Currently, the most common method of assessment is palpation of anatomic landmarks, particularly the iliac crests and the spinous processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%