2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1990341319010097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Problems of Modern Stellar Astronomy and Main Research Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize here that the latter mechanism was primarily justified by an integrated abundance of different elements, whereas the detailed rigidity spectra have become known only now. On the theoretical side, the p/He calculations (Malkov et al 2012) are based on an analytic theory (Malkov & Völk 1995) that allows freedom in selecting seed particles for injection. Pre-energized particles evaporating from the shocked downstream plasma back upstream (Parker 1961;Quest 1988) and shock reflected particles (Burgess & Scholer 2015) have been most often discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to emphasize here that the latter mechanism was primarily justified by an integrated abundance of different elements, whereas the detailed rigidity spectra have become known only now. On the theoretical side, the p/He calculations (Malkov et al 2012) are based on an analytic theory (Malkov & Völk 1995) that allows freedom in selecting seed particles for injection. Pre-energized particles evaporating from the shocked downstream plasma back upstream (Parker 1961;Quest 1988) and shock reflected particles (Burgess & Scholer 2015) have been most often discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proton injection is only efficient at quasi-parallel shocks. This follows from simple kinematic considerations (Malkov & Völk 1995) and is supported by Monte-Carlo (Ellison et al 1995) and hybrid simulations (Caprioli & Spitkovsky 2014). The angle beyond which the proton injection drops fast is close to θ cr = π/4.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The critical angle ϑ nB = ϑ cr , beyond which the proton injection rate into the DSA drops sharply, is close to ϑ cr π/4. This choice of the source for particle injection is supported by simple theoretical considerations (Malkov & Völk 1995;Völk et al 2003), as well as Monte-Carlo (Ellison et al 1995) and hybrid simulations, e.g., (Thomas & Winske 1990;Caprioli & Spitkovsky 2014). A simple explanation is that for larger ϑ nB the recession of the field line -shock intersection point is too fast for the downstream particles to return upstream and continue acceleration.…”
Section: Particle Acceleration Domain On the Shock Surfacementioning
confidence: 97%