2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current progress and critical challenges to overcome in the bioinformatics of mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The protein inference problem is exacerbated in environmental metaproteomics due to (1) complex and unknown taxonomy, necessitating large databases and a priori information (e.g., taxa inferred from 16S or metagenomic data), (2) frequent cohabitation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms and (3) the presence of conserved protein domains which can exist across phylogenetically distinct organisms. Unfortunately, the large databases required for protein inference provide more opportunities for peptide degeneracy, thus peptide-to-protein and peptide-to-taxa assignments remain significant challenges in metaproteomics studies (Miura & Okuda, 2023).…”
Section: The Protein Inference Problem In Metaproteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The protein inference problem is exacerbated in environmental metaproteomics due to (1) complex and unknown taxonomy, necessitating large databases and a priori information (e.g., taxa inferred from 16S or metagenomic data), (2) frequent cohabitation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms and (3) the presence of conserved protein domains which can exist across phylogenetically distinct organisms. Unfortunately, the large databases required for protein inference provide more opportunities for peptide degeneracy, thus peptide-to-protein and peptide-to-taxa assignments remain significant challenges in metaproteomics studies (Miura & Okuda, 2023).…”
Section: The Protein Inference Problem In Metaproteomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the target‐decoy approach incorporates decoy hits in its estimation of true positives, lower‐scoring true positive hits will be reported as false positives, reducing overall protein identifications. Despite this, an FDR‐based approach using target‐decoy reference databases remains the standard method for protein identification in metaproteomics studies; however, the method is currently being revised (Miura & Okuda, 2023).…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The metaproteomic studies are focused on determining the species diversity in a community, studying various stages of the life cycle of microorganisms, their response to stress, the functional characterization of microbiomes, etc 3 . Being a young field, metaproteomics possess challenges that must be overcome before using for routine research 2,4 . Currently, the research efforts are focused on accuracy, sensitivity, and reproducibility of the analysis, development of bioinformatic solutions, and standardization of workflows 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A metagenomic-sequencing database from the same sample would increase the rate of protein identification. Therefore, in this work, the database is composed of protein amino acid sequences obtained by metagenomic analyses of the samples to be analyzed, which can improve the protein-identification rate [19]. Some studies have shown that multiomics can comprehensively unravel the mechanism of complicated microorganism communities [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%