2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current research and development in cotton harvesters: A review with application to Indian cotton production systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the specific functions of MAPs and microtubules in cotton plant height regulation remain unclear. In cotton, a dwarf and compact morphology is advantageous for mechanical harvesting, which lowers labor costs [34,35], except for the lodging resistance and photosynthetic efficiency [2,3,46]. In this study, we demonstrated that the silencing of GhTUBB1 in the R15 variety reduced plant height.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the specific functions of MAPs and microtubules in cotton plant height regulation remain unclear. In cotton, a dwarf and compact morphology is advantageous for mechanical harvesting, which lowers labor costs [34,35], except for the lodging resistance and photosynthetic efficiency [2,3,46]. In this study, we demonstrated that the silencing of GhTUBB1 in the R15 variety reduced plant height.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Dwarf varieties of upland cotton are more suitable for mechanical picking [34], which will become a dominant trend in the future [35]. The identification and cloning of more dwarfing-related genes can provide targets for breeding dwarf varieties and promote development of the cotton industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although manual topping is still the dominant topping method, especially in developing economies, it is only suitable for use in small-to medium-sized cotton farms because of its intensive labor needs and cannot meet the broad-acre production demands in advanced economies [88,89] . On the other hand, chemical topping offers a low-labor need, harvest efficiency enhancing (through improved plant architecture), a time-efficient, convenient, and easily mechanized technique which does not cause physical damage or missed hitting to plants as with mechanical and manual topping, respectively [92][93][94] .…”
Section: Chemical Toppingmentioning
confidence: 99%