2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.2972588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current-Sensor-Based Contact Stiffness Detection for Prosthetic Hands

Abstract: When a prosthetic hand grasps an object, a proper grasping force should be exerted according to the stiffness properties of the grasped object so that damage caused by excessive force or slide caused by insufficient force is prevented. To implement stiffness detection and simultaneously to prevent errors and defects caused by the use of force sensors and the difficulties in the direct measurement of the deformation of the grasped object, a force sensor-less method of contact stiffness detection is proposed for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we proposed a methodology that uses intrinsic sensors (sensors and parameters already available on the prosthesis) for the normal functionality of the prosthesis that does not increase the cost and complexity of the device. In particular, we exploited the following intrinsic sensors: the motor-side current, whose relationship with the contact stiffness has been analytically demonstrated by Deng et al ( 2020 ); the reference position, given as input to control the device closure; and the position effectively measured by the encoder (encoder position). We implemented a closed-loop vibratory feedback, using a single vibromotor embedded in the Hannes system, closely related to the predictions made by the classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, we proposed a methodology that uses intrinsic sensors (sensors and parameters already available on the prosthesis) for the normal functionality of the prosthesis that does not increase the cost and complexity of the device. In particular, we exploited the following intrinsic sensors: the motor-side current, whose relationship with the contact stiffness has been analytically demonstrated by Deng et al ( 2020 ); the reference position, given as input to control the device closure; and the position effectively measured by the encoder (encoder position). We implemented a closed-loop vibratory feedback, using a single vibromotor embedded in the Hannes system, closely related to the predictions made by the classifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these examples have a common theme: the sensing element is embedded in the finger. In fact, the only grasp force sensing approach found in the literature at the time of conducting this research were current sensing approaches [ 33 , 34 ]. This is problematic for several reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sEMG signals of 15 different finger movements were classified with a 99.52% accuracy. However, these methods do not take the grip into account when studying the grip of an object by hand, and the grip size is important when the user grabs the object with a manipulator [17][18][19]. For grip estimation, Ma et al [20] collected sEMG signals in the forearm multi-channel, the grip was collected by a force sensor, and predictive models were built using a gene expression programming algorithm and neural network to predict grip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%