2016
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current State and Model for Development of Technology-Based Care for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wearable device obtains data streams from IMUs and an OHR sensor that have been shown to be relevant in measuring hyperactive behaviour (acceleration, gyro, and heart rate data) [ 9 , 23 , 24 , 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the most relevant systems presented in the literature are reviewed. These systems have been designed with wearable devices that help provide a more accurate diagnosis of hyperactive behaviour estimators than traditional tools based on subjective interpretation [ 53 , 54 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As people with ADHD commonly struggle with time management, organisation, completing tasks, and failure to pay attention to details, technology can support them in the difficult task to stay focused in a school or work environment (Hurley, 2018[166]). Benyakorn et al (2016) have analysed the current state of technology-care for ADHD, considering six specific traits that can be helped through technology (Benyakorn et al, 2016[165]). Results are shown in Table 2.8.…”
Section: Assistive Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%