2007
DOI: 10.1177/1358863x07079823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current state of endovascular treatment of femoro-popliteal artery disease

Abstract: Considerable advances have been made over the last decade in percutaneous technology for the treatment of atherosclerotic diseases in the femoro-popliteal arteries. While treatment strategies are well defined in the iliac segment, where angioplasty and stenting perform well in appropriately selected lesions, the search for a durable transcatheter therapy for femoro-popliteal lesions continues. Whereas balloon angioplasty (PTA) is the accepted therapy for short lesions, long diffuse lesions are still recommende… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
76
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Most of the lesions responsible for IC are located in the femoropopliteal arteries (70%) with the remainder in the aortoiliac arteries. 23 Isolated tibial disease is present in only 15% of this population. Accordingly, treatment paradigms derived from clinical outcome studies specified by anatomic level (ie, aortoiliac versus femoropopliteal) have emerged to guide therapeutic decision making.…”
Section: Intermittent Claudicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Most of the lesions responsible for IC are located in the femoropopliteal arteries (70%) with the remainder in the aortoiliac arteries. 23 Isolated tibial disease is present in only 15% of this population. Accordingly, treatment paradigms derived from clinical outcome studies specified by anatomic level (ie, aortoiliac versus femoropopliteal) have emerged to guide therapeutic decision making.…”
Section: Intermittent Claudicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of drug-eluting stents releasing cytotoxic agents, such as rapamycin and paclitaxel, has significantly reduced the incidence of restenosis after coronary angioplasty (Moses et al, 2003;Gershlick et al, 2004), concerns persist regarding the safety of these drug-eluting stents, given the potential for fatal coronary in-stent thrombosis (Jeremias and Kirtane, 2008). Moreover, the long-term efficacy of these drug-eluting stents has not been fully established in the revascularization of cerebrovascular or peripheral arteries (Gupta et al, 2006;Zeller, 2007). These findings collectively underscore the need to develop alternative pharmacological approaches that target the proliferation and migration of vascular SMCs to prevent neointima formation in injured arteries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Restenosis occurs in 40% to 60% of patients with FP disease by 12 months after percutaneous balloon angioplasty, which has been the standard and traditional endovascular revascularization procedure. [4][5][6] Recently, implantation of nitinol stents has improved the long-term outcome of endovascular therapy (EVT) for FP lesions in comparison with balloon angioplasty, 7,8 and guidelines have been revised to extend the indications of EVT because of these improvements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%