2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-021-02236-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current state of machine learning for non-melanoma skin cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a combination is similar to pathologist's diagnostic thinking and is expected to be applied in clinical practice. When dealing with common clinical problem (hesitation between BCC and TE), the differentiation classifier can discriminate BCC from TE in model setting with comparable performance to some of previous studies 17,19 . The performance of the this classifiers is above mean level (sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 81.1%) for machine learning in the diagnosis of non‐melanoma skin cancers, but under the top level to differentiate BCC from TE (recall = 100%) 17,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Such a combination is similar to pathologist's diagnostic thinking and is expected to be applied in clinical practice. When dealing with common clinical problem (hesitation between BCC and TE), the differentiation classifier can discriminate BCC from TE in model setting with comparable performance to some of previous studies 17,19 . The performance of the this classifiers is above mean level (sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 81.1%) for machine learning in the diagnosis of non‐melanoma skin cancers, but under the top level to differentiate BCC from TE (recall = 100%) 17,19 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…When dealing with common clinical problem (hesitation between BCC and TE), the differentiation classifier can discriminate BCC from TE in model setting with comparable performance to some of previous studies. 17,19 The performance of the this classifiers is above mean level (sensitivity = 89.2%, specificity = 81.1%) for machine learning in the diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancers, but under the top level to differentiate BCC from TE (recall = 100%). 17,19 However, the later model was trained only on 5 sections of TE and test on one slide to differentiate BCC from TE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Artificial Intelligence is the science of machines learning how to perform human tasks, the term was coined in the 50 years when scientists began to explore how computers could solve their problems on their own. Recently, it has been created frameworks containing IA systems used in the medical domain 41,42 where researchers involving artificial intelligence techniques have been making encouraging and important progress in the diagnosis, and therapy 43 of various diseases, especially skin lesions. Since early detection is essential for a successful course of treatment, AI techniques are now capable of successfully detecting cancer earlier than traditional techniques 44 .…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence For Skin Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%