2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2021.105644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status, advancements and development needs of geospatial decision support tools for marine spatial planning in European seas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cumulative impact assessment is increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of multiple pressures on marine ecosystems in MSP (e.g. Gissi et al, 2017 ; Jones et al, 2018 ) and here DSTs are considered a valuable instrument to reduce the inherent complexities of ecosystem for environmental managers and conservation practitioners with the aim to decrease vulnerability and increase resilience in natural systems ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ). Some of the existing DSTs include elements of cumulative impacts assessment to support ecosystem-based management from national to macro-regional scales and thereby effectively facilitating communication at the science-policy interface ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cumulative impact assessment is increasingly being used to evaluate the impact of multiple pressures on marine ecosystems in MSP (e.g. Gissi et al, 2017 ; Jones et al, 2018 ) and here DSTs are considered a valuable instrument to reduce the inherent complexities of ecosystem for environmental managers and conservation practitioners with the aim to decrease vulnerability and increase resilience in natural systems ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ). Some of the existing DSTs include elements of cumulative impacts assessment to support ecosystem-based management from national to macro-regional scales and thereby effectively facilitating communication at the science-policy interface ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Gissi et al, 2017 ; Jones et al, 2018 ) and here DSTs are considered a valuable instrument to reduce the inherent complexities of ecosystem for environmental managers and conservation practitioners with the aim to decrease vulnerability and increase resilience in natural systems ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ). Some of the existing DSTs include elements of cumulative impacts assessment to support ecosystem-based management from national to macro-regional scales and thereby effectively facilitating communication at the science-policy interface ( Depellegrin et al, 2021 ). These tools mostly apply a widely accepted approach of cumulative impact assessment ( Halpern et al, 2008 ) without fully explaining or exploring limitations of assumption behind the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different management scenarios can also be incorporated into the HRA model (e.g. one stressor vs multiple stressors management) so as to explore their efficiency towards stressor mitigation as well as meeting the ecosystem-based marine spatial planning requirements [45], [47], [48].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, the HRA-DBN will integrate physical/biological indicators associated with climate change and upper trophic levels affected by MRED in order to assess and predict ecosystem and population trade-offs and future distributions. This will help to identify potential mitigation and compensatory measures at correct spatio-temporal scales to maximise future ecosystem value and functioning in order to enhance marine spatial planning processes [17], [47], [48].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%