Dear Editor, We congratulate Drs Ando and Okano and colleagues from the Japanese Society for Abdominal Emergency Medicine (JSAEM) on their excellent analysis and the exceptional outcome of patients treated for main pancreatic duct (MPD) injuries. 1 We concur that major pancreatic injuries still result in considerable morbidity, even when treated in well-resourced referral centers, and strongly endorse the notion proposed by the authors that experienced teams should be involved in the management of such injuries as in the JSAEM study. 1 We agree that it is judicious to involve a proficient pancreatic surgeon at an early stage as the technical intricacies both for resection and reconstruction of complex pancreatic injuries require special organ-specific surgical skills and expertise. 2 The authors do not detail the specifics, but current data support the use of initial damage-control laparotomy for complex combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries and delayed pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) once compromised patient physiology has been corrected. In the largest published series of PD for trauma, 19 patients in our unit had a PD, either at the initial operation (n = 13) or after damage control (n = 6). 2 The authors do not provide detailed information on the 41 patients who had endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In our report of 47 patients who underwent ERCP, 11 had an intact MPD with minor peripheral injuries which required no further intervention. A pancreatic fistula was demonstrated in 24 patients, a MPD stricture in 12 of whom 10 had a pseudocyst. Fifteen patients had a pancreatic duct sphincterotomy, seven had a pancreatic stent inserted, and six had an endoscopic pseudocyst drainage. 3 In a further study of 432 consecutive patients with pancreatic injuries, 27 who presented with delayed pancreatic complications underwent an ERCP. 4 The degree and extent of the MPD injury was assessed using the Cape Town pancreatographic grading system for pancreatic injuries, modified from the original Takishima classification. Fourteen patients with grade 2a, 3a, 3b, or 4c MPD injuries were successfully treated endoscopically with either pancreatic duct stenting or pseudocyst drainage while 13 patients with grade 4a or 4b duct injuries required surgical intervention after failed endoscopic management for complete MPD disconnection. 4