2016
DOI: 10.21037/qims.2016.05.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of carotid ultrasound in atherosclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(111 reference statements)
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been demonstrated that low and/or oscillatory arterial shear stress promotes early plaque formation . In the carotid artery, shear wall stress is lower at the posterior wall and the location where the majority of plaques occur . We hypothesize that given the different branching geometry of the VA from the subclavian, the lower wall shear stress may occur at the medial wall, promoting plaque formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It has been demonstrated that low and/or oscillatory arterial shear stress promotes early plaque formation . In the carotid artery, shear wall stress is lower at the posterior wall and the location where the majority of plaques occur . We hypothesize that given the different branching geometry of the VA from the subclavian, the lower wall shear stress may occur at the medial wall, promoting plaque formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Due to the inter-patient variation in terms of defensive mechanisms, this is an additional factor preventing an assessment of stenotic degree based on the comparison between patent vessel diameter and the total width of the vessel (and even more so surface area measurements). On the other hand, comparing the diameter of a patent vessel at the site of stenosis with the segment located above may produce an error of underestimation in the case of significant stenosis of more than 70–80% (2,8) . In such cases, a decrease in the flow volume (in accordance with the Spencer’s Curve) occurs, leading to decreased blood pressure and, consequently, reduced vascular diameter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Carotid plaques also progress circumferentially, thus quantification of plaque volume instead of plaque area can reflect the actual plaque burden more sensitively. 3,4,7,8 Recent study 8 17.39%, p=0.241). 42 Retrospective high resolution MR study including non-significant stenosis in the intracranial vessel demonstrated that eccentricity was more higher in the symptomatic plaque than in the asymptomatic plaque (p=0.028).…”
Section: Assessment Of Carotid Plaque Burden Using Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since then, unfortunately IMT did accurately reflect neither atherosclerosis nor prediction of clinical events. 2,3 To improve the predictive power of plaque screening for cardio-cerebrovascular events beyond IMT, quantifying the carotid plaque burden has been developed as a good alternative to IMT measurement. Carotid plaques grow along the artery 2.4 times faster than they thicken, thus we can easily deduce that two-dimensional measurement of total plaque area reflects the actual plaque burden more accurately.…”
Section: Assessment Of Carotid Plaque Burden Using Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%