Current status of education and research on public health nutrition in Japan: comparison with South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China

Abstract

Background: Although the importance of capacity building for public health nutrition (PHN) has been increasing globally, reports on the current status of training programs for PHN in East-Asia including Japan are limited. The aim of this study was to compare the current status of education and research activities in the field of PHN in Japan with those in South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China. Methods: Necessary information was collected by internet search and telephone inquiry. Collection focused on the number of departments in colleges and universities with PHN as a compulsory subject in the 2016 academic year, and the number of articles and information related to these articles published in the journal Public Health Nutrition between 2007 and 2016. Results: The number of departments with PHN as a compulsory subject was the highest in Japan (n = 137), followed by mainland China (n = 32), Taiwan (n = 18) and South Korea (n = 7). Using the classification list of education in each country and region, the majority of these departments were classified as home economics, natural science, health and welfare, and medical science in Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, respectively. Regarding publications, most of the articles were written in colleges and universities not having PHN as a compulsory subject in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. The number of articles per department among departments with compulsory PHN education was lowest in Japan (n = 0.3) compared to Taiwan, mainland China, and South Korea (n = 1.2, 2.7, and 3.7, respectively). Conclusions: Japan has a much higher number of departments with PHN as a compulsory subject than neighboring East Asian states and relatively low research activities in the field of PHN. This suggests that current university education may not lead to active PHN research in Japan. Further studies are warranted to explore the reasons for this.

Disaster Preparedness and Associated Factors Among Emergency Nurses in Guangdong Province, China: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

“…Due to the different political backgrounds, economic policies, cultures, and medical health levels between Taiwan and mainland China, the Taiwan version of the DPET could not be used directly. 31 Moreover, the Taiwan version retains the entries for the response to biological terrorism, which are the task of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in mainland China, not the task of emergency nurses. Therefore, we adjusted the DPET again.…”

Are popular books about diet and health written based on scientific evidence? A comparison of citations between the USA and Japan

“…In Japan, 58 % of books written by registered dietitians cited any references, but none cited systematic reviews. A previous study suggested that institutions with public health nutrition programmes may not be active in research related to public health nutrition in Japan (57) . This situation may have led to the lack of citation of systematic reviews in Japanese books written by registered dietitians.…”

Web-Based Content on Diet and Nutrition Written in Japanese: Infodemiology Study Based on Google Trends and Google Search

“…The reason for this is unknown, but such information may be an expression of food-related philosophy [29] or daily activities (such as family cooking) [28]. Ultimately, these phenomena might be attributable to the inadequate nature of training courses, research centers, and academia in the field of public health nutrition in Japan [37]. Therefore, empirical data on this point are urgently needed.…”