2020
DOI: 10.1055/a-1071-8322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current status of immunotherapy in gastrointestinal malignancies

Abstract: Gastrointestinal (GI) malignant neoplasms have a high global incidence and a huge impact on cancer-associated mortality. In the past years, excitement was growing among oncologists and patients alike for the use of immunotherapy, specifically immune checkpoint inhibitors. The approval of several PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors radically changed the treatment landscape in many cancer types and established immune-oncology as a new treatment strategy against cancer. Despite major breakthrough reports, shortcomin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed treatment algorithms for many patients, including many types of gastrointestinal cancers. [ 9 ] PD-1/PD-L1 is the best studied immune check-point in the context of cancer. [ 10 ] PD-1 represents an inhibitory receptor, which is found on different immune cells including T- and B-cells as well as natural killer cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has changed treatment algorithms for many patients, including many types of gastrointestinal cancers. [ 9 ] PD-1/PD-L1 is the best studied immune check-point in the context of cancer. [ 10 ] PD-1 represents an inhibitory receptor, which is found on different immune cells including T- and B-cells as well as natural killer cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ICIs have shown limited survival bene ts to GC patients. Most patients with GC either do not respond to ICIs, develop primary and acquired treatment resistance [21], or experience immune-related adverse events [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we cannot answer the important question whether an HCC patient with an initial serum level above our ideal prognostic cut-off value might have had a similar or even better outcome if treated differently. Given the ongoing studies on adjuvant immunotherapies after resection of HCC [ 29 ], a biomarker identifying patients that should receive additional therapy after surgery could be of valuable clinical relevance. Finally, we concentrated on the patients’ OS as a primary endpoint only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%