Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer

Shehzad, Khalid; Mohiuddin, Kamran; Nizami, Saira; Sharma, Hemant; Khan, Iftikhar M.; Memon, Breda; Memon, Muhammed Ashraf

doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2007.04.012

Cited by 80 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The proponents of LADG argue that the procedure is superior to ODG because it is associated with less postoperative pain, reduced peri-operative blood loss, quicker return to gastrointestinal function, faster hospital discharge, an earlier return to work and unrestricted physical activity, and a better cosmetic result 2 . The opponents, however, argue that there is a higher incidence of major intraoperative and postoperative complications because of the complexity of the procedure and absence of tactile sensation, substantially greater costs, much longer anaesthetic and operating time, decreased numbers of lymph nodes harvesting essential for oncological adequacy, insufficient surgical resection margins and potential for cancer reimplantation at trocar sites 2 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

et al. 2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT:Objectives: The aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of the randomized evidence to determine the relative merits of laparoscopic assisted (LADG) and open (ODG) distal gastrectomy for proven gastric cancer. However, for commencement of oral intake, duration of hospital stay and complication rate, the trend was in favour of LADG. Data sources and review methods: Conclusion:LADG was associated with a significantly reduced rate of intraoperative blood loss, at the expense of significantly longer operating time and significantly reduced lymph node retrieval compared to its open counterpart.Mortality and tumour recurrence rates were similar between the two groups.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

et al. 2008

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kitano et al (9) conducted the first laparoscopic gastric surgery in 1991. Some centers reported that laparoscopy could be applied in early stage gastric cancer, with similar results obtained in terms of oncological principles in minimally invasive surgery as compared to open surgery (10)(11)(12). In addition, postoperative patient comfort was shown to be better in laparoscopic surgery.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…Although it has been shown in many studies that open surgery and laparoscopic surgery have similar oncological results, it is observed that conventional minimally invasive surgery have not gained acceptance for gastric cancer surgery because especially D2 lymph node dissection is a complex surgical technique (11). Some technical disadvantages unique to conventional laparoscopic surgery are also known to cause this condition.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Robot assisted laparoscopic (RAL) gastrectomy: case series and a review of the literature

Ali̇moğlu

Atak

Eren

et al. 2014

UCD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common cancer type and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The contemporary treatment is gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy, which can be accomplished by either conventional (open), or laparoscopic surgery. With the advances in technology, there is a paradigm shift from conventional laparoscopy. As a result, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) have evolved as new treatment options for minimal invasive surgery. Herein five patients who were treated via robot assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy were reported together with review of the literature.

show abstract

“…To sum up, although it has not been clearly shown whether RAL hepatic and pancreatic surgery are superior to the laparoscopic technique in selected patients, authors report that the robotic technique can be performed safely in hepatic and pancreatic surgery. More expert studies in this field are necessary to better evaluate the long term oncological results and cost analyses of RAL hepatic and pancreatic surgery (37 (4,41,42). In addition, laparoscopic surgery has been shown to offer better postoperative comfort to the patient.…”

Section: Robotic Hepatopancreaticobiliary System Surgerymentioning

confidence: 99%

Robotik Gastrointestinal Cerrahide Güncel Uygulama

Ali̇moğlu¹,

Sağıroğlu²,

Alsmadi³

et al. 2016

Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

General surgical diseases have been long treated via conventional (open) or laparoscopic operations. With the advances in technology, there is a paradigm shift from conventional laparoscopy. As a result, single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), and robotic surgery have evolved as new treatment options for minimal invasive surgery. It has been shown in many series that a wide variety of procedures of general surgery can be managed safely and effectively by robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS). In this review, current advances and practice in robotics in the most commonly applied gastrointestinal surgical procedures will be emphasized.

show abstract

Current status of minimal access surgery for gastric cancer

Cited by 80 publications

References 68 publications

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

Meta-analysis of laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma

Robot assisted laparoscopic (RAL) gastrectomy: case series and a review of the literature

Robotik Gastrointestinal Cerrahide Güncel Uygulama

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About