The Future Supply of Nature-Made Petroleum and Gas 1977
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-021735-2.50049-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current Status of Projects Gasbuggy, Rulison, and Rio Blanco and an Appraisal of Nuclear-Explosive Fracturing Potential for the Near Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) closing of newly created, unsupported fractures; and (3) sealing of the cavity walls by solidified melt glass (Stosur 1977). Although permeability in the region within one cavity radius of the chimney may have increased by a factor of up to 100 over the pretest permeabilities, the fracture zone is relatively small compared to the surrounding contributing reservoir, and production is ultimately limited by that unaffected zone.…”
Section: Description Of the Gasbuggy Test And Its Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) closing of newly created, unsupported fractures; and (3) sealing of the cavity walls by solidified melt glass (Stosur 1977). Although permeability in the region within one cavity radius of the chimney may have increased by a factor of up to 100 over the pretest permeabilities, the fracture zone is relatively small compared to the surrounding contributing reservoir, and production is ultimately limited by that unaffected zone.…”
Section: Description Of the Gasbuggy Test And Its Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) overestimation of formation permeability prior to the test; (2) closing of newly created, unsupported fractures; and (3) sealing of the cavity walls by solidified melt glass (Stosur, 1977).…”
Section: Description Of the Gasbuggy Test And Its Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing revealed lower-than-expected production performance, which was attributed to the following factors: (1) overestimation of formation permeability prior to the test; (2) closing of newly created, unsupported fractures; and (3) sealing of the cavity walls by solidified melt glass (Stosur 1977). Although permeability in the region within one cavity radius of the chimney may have increased by a factor of up to 100 over the pretest permeabilities, the fracture zone is relatively small compared to the surrounding contributing reservoir, and production is ultimately limited by that unaffected zone.…”
Section: Description Of the Gasbuggy Test And Its Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%