2009
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current strategies for monitoring men with localised prostate cancer lack a strong evidence base: observational longitudinal study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends conservative management of men with 'low-risk' localised prostate cancer, monitoring the disease using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics and re-biopsy. However, there is little evidence of the changes in PSA level that should alert to the need for clinical re-assessment. METHODS: This study compares the alerts resulting from PSA kinetics and a novel longitudinal reference range approach, which incorporate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher baseline PSA and T stage were associated with a higher rate of change to radical treatment. PSA changes (including PSADT and PSAv) also led to many changes in treatment, although evidence of the validity of PSA as a measure of disease progression is lacking [45][46][47][48]. There was no evidence that any PSA eligibility criteria, frequency of PSA testing, or adoption of PSA triggers for treatment change were associated with rate of treatment change among studies, and only weak evidence that less mature studies had a higher rate of change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Higher baseline PSA and T stage were associated with a higher rate of change to radical treatment. PSA changes (including PSADT and PSAv) also led to many changes in treatment, although evidence of the validity of PSA as a measure of disease progression is lacking [45][46][47][48]. There was no evidence that any PSA eligibility criteria, frequency of PSA testing, or adoption of PSA triggers for treatment change were associated with rate of treatment change among studies, and only weak evidence that less mature studies had a higher rate of change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We chose the five most recent PSA measurements because these provide a balance between sensitivity to upturns in velocity and insensitivity to random fluctuations (11). In sensitivity analyses, we determined whether results were similar if PSAV was derived from the four most recent PSA measurements (PSAV four ) and from all available (men with a minimum of five) PSA measurements (PSAV all ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a biostatistical approach, we estimated that a proportion of the prostate cancer is capable of dedifferentiation in the preclinical phase. Confirmation of these findings could come from the active monitoring arm of the ongoing ProtecT study 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%