2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/abc63c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current structure in the scrape-off layer of a tokamak in a quiescent state

Abstract: Currents structure in the scrape-off layer (SOL) of a tokamak is analyzed. It is demonstrated that poloidal currents measured in the experiments are a combination of several current types of different physical nature. Besides known Pfirsch-Schlüter (PS) currents and thermoelectric currents, so-called plate closing currents (PCC) flowing to/from the divertor plates are also analyzed. The latter close radial currents in the SOL and below/above the Xpoint in the SOL and private flux region (PFR). In particular, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Radial electric fields were generated by the potential gradients, pointing from the inner confined region to the highly ionizing region, resulting in E r × B drifts from the X-point to the high-field-side upstream position. A potential hill was found at the X-point, which corresponds to the poloidal current leaving the X-point to the divertor targets and to the upstream position [26]. Given the temperature and its gradient as well as the electric conductivity near the X-point were already low, the currents were mainly driven by the poloidal electric field.…”
Section: Poloidal Asymmetry and The Effects Of Driftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial electric fields were generated by the potential gradients, pointing from the inner confined region to the highly ionizing region, resulting in E r × B drifts from the X-point to the high-field-side upstream position. A potential hill was found at the X-point, which corresponds to the poloidal current leaving the X-point to the divertor targets and to the upstream position [26]. Given the temperature and its gradient as well as the electric conductivity near the X-point were already low, the currents were mainly driven by the poloidal electric field.…”
Section: Poloidal Asymmetry and The Effects Of Driftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the role of drifts and currents in divertor asymmetry, let us start from consideration of currents type flowing in the SOL and private flux region (PFR), following the paper. [ 34 ] Besides the well‐known, B vertical currents, Pfirsch‐Schlüter current, and thermoelectric current there exist so‐called plate‐closing currents, which close the divergent part of perpendicular currents through targets, see Figure 1. The requirement for plate‐closing currents is that the net current to all short‐circuited plasma‐facing components (including targets) is zero.…”
Section: Role Of Drifts and Currents In Divertor Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative role of plate‐closing currents and local magnitude of current density along the target depends on parameters and operational regime, which is demonstrated in AUG experiments. [ 34 ] Figure 2 shows how the current density changes in direction and magnitude along the outer target in the H‐mode AUG discharge, and how current flow directions in PFR, near SOL, and far SOL are reproduced by SOLPS‐ITER modelling.…”
Section: Role Of Drifts and Currents In Divertor Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of drift current contributions in the SOL and PFR shows that, beyond the thermoelectric current contribution, both plate closing currents (PCCs) compensating downward ∇B current [20][21][22] and parallel currents compensating neutral friction currents [22][23][24] contribute to the j ∥ profile along the divertor targets. We note for completeness that the well known Pfirsch-Schlüter parallel currents [23], which arise to short circuit ∇B and curvature drifts in the SOL above the X-point, do not make any significant contribution to the target integral current.…”
Section: Contributions To the Divertor Plate Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These currents then run through their respective divertor targets, re-entering the plasma outside the separatrix, completing 'plate-closing' current circuits. These drift-driven PCCs cancel themselves out when integrated over the entire plate, resulting in the total SOL current equalling that through the divertor cassette (SOLPS-ITER simulations are 2D and calculate the total, toroidally symmetric current flowing into all divertor targets) [21,22]. The divertor shunt diagnostic only measures this integrated total SOL current and therefore is blind to the effects of the neutral-friction current and PCCs.…”
Section: Contributions To the Divertor Plate Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%