2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ddmod.2014.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Current technological advances in mapping new DNA modifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 64 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, 5hmC can be modified to CMS by treatment with bisulfite and immunoprecipitated by a CMS‐specific antibody for subsequent analysis, thereby offering more sensitive and specific enrichment . However, the disadvantages of hMeDIP include its dependence on 5hmC density, its inability to give single‐base resolution, and its off‐target affinity of the antibody for simple repeats and CA dinucleotides .…”
Section: Methods Involving Dna‐enrichment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, 5hmC can be modified to CMS by treatment with bisulfite and immunoprecipitated by a CMS‐specific antibody for subsequent analysis, thereby offering more sensitive and specific enrichment . However, the disadvantages of hMeDIP include its dependence on 5hmC density, its inability to give single‐base resolution, and its off‐target affinity of the antibody for simple repeats and CA dinucleotides .…”
Section: Methods Involving Dna‐enrichment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%